![]() ![]() Curated Content: How does the service help you find new things to read?.Cross-platform Support: How well does the service work with various devices, and how easy is it to export items out to other services?.Multimedia: How does each service handle material beyond words like images and video?.Save Method: How easy is it to save items to read later, and what options are available as you save them?. ![]() Organizational Options: How can one sort through the items that have been saved? Can they be sorted and organized in different ways? And how easy is it to find an item that’s not at the top of your list?.Reading Experience: Since the purpose of these services is to provide a better reading experience than the web, how does each service present that experience to the reader?.We considered the following aspects of each service in making our decision: As you browse the web during the day, you can pick and choose the things you want to read, and at night, instead of continuing to browse, you have a hand-picked selection of great material ready for you to read. You could think of these services like Tivo for the Internet. Read-it-later services can solve all of these problems, helping you save articles to read on your preferred device in a much friendlier, more beautiful format. Depending on the website, reading on the web can often be a hostile experience with distracting ads, over-pagination, requests to sign up for newsletters, and spammy “promoted stories from around the web” cluttering up your reading and making you question the moral fabric of human civilization. Ideally, you could have a place to store those articles for later when you actually have the time to curl up on that couch. It’s much nicer to curl up on the couch with a mobile device like a phone or a tablet.īut even more importantly, you don’t always have time to read an article the first moment you come across it. The problem is this: the internet overflows with amazing things to read, but a computer is not a great device for reading. It was a terrible solution to the problem that read-it-later services finally solved on the iPhone and later the iPad. I would actually copy and paste articles from the internet into text documents, and then use various apps to read those text documents. I started buying my first PDAs and smartphones back in the early 2000s, and I immediately began trying to hack together a way to read long-form articles on these mobile devices. Each app has its own strengths and weaknesses, and Pocket has some features that could make it the ideal app for some use cases, but Instapaper is our favorite app for actually reading the best writing on the web … later. In the read-it-later space, the two dominant players have long been Instapaper and Pocket. These rivalries are great for consumers because each application is forced to hone its own approach and polish its unique features. The world of software occasionally produces fruitful rivalries between applications that try to solve the same problem with different approaches: Omnifocus vs. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |